
When we are confronted with ourselves outside of our own constructed context, we suddenly find ourselves facing a stranger. Like when you hear your own voice on a recording, or see your face on a photograph instead of in a mirror. The photographer Man Ray once demonstrated how little we actually see of ourselves when he took a self portrait then added a simple ink line cross over his face to high light how crooked it actually was. Until you saw the uncompromising lines of the superimposed cross, you never comprehended the lack of actual symmetry in a human face. At least, I never did, and I was drawing and looking at human beings all day long.
So, does an artist actually understand all this and take it into account or is art merely another form of self deception? I think art must be some form of self analysis if it is to be considered a form of self expression. In other to express yourself, you must have some understanding of where your expression comes from. If you didn't, then you'd be no better than an automaton.
Unless art is preprogrammed into our genes, then it must be a product of minds grown dark and convoluted with imagination born of self deception. In other words, in art we try to express ourselves, but our self expression is based on the compromises we have evolved since birth in order to make sense of our existence.
I personally doubt that art is self expression, rather I think art is always a means to understanding reality. Like when you argue to clarify in your own mind what you actually think.
No comments:
Post a Comment