data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3595d/3595dc723c8678a9e167ae618dd1263c455f51c8" alt=""
And, this is yet another Spielberg film where the Father/Son dynamic takes centre stage...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2694c/2694c41e84c3a1a2464b08da37bdff4eaefca2c0" alt=""
On the other hand though... Harrison Ford still looks great, though even he is finding latter day Lucas script writing to be something of a challenge. He romps around doing his thing and beating the bad guys, and thats what we like. Simplicity and special effects. Shia Le Beouf seems okay, but there is a certain pretty-boyishness about him that I find slightly annoying. The whole, Marlon Brando rip off for example just struck me as contrived and he didn't really seem the part.
Frankly there is so much bad one could say about this film, so many things strike me as being just plain daft, but in the end, thats what I expect from Indiana Jones! Lost alien civilisations and two dimensional bad guys are what pulp is all about. I don't want to take it seriously, I just want it to look good, and whilst its not the 1930's... its close enough. I could whine all night, but I actually enjoyed it. Love is when you forgive people all there flaws, and I love Indiana Jones!
Four stars means good. I'd give it five, but it wasn't a patch on 'Raiders of the Lost Ark'
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e83e/7e83e0f1253fa78a4f9632c3595ca08186f21870" alt=""
2 comments:
Like you I had no expectations above being entertained for a couple of hours - and that's exactly what I got.
Entertainment from start to finish. The film never lets up with the adventure and the pace.
It's not an award winner (if you don't count the Golden turkeys it has gained). But it is entertainment and that's all i wanted.
Although I did give up counting the number of times that Cate blanchett lost the ability to hold that aweful accent!
LOL
Yeah. I noticed that too.
Post a Comment